Petalie
learn · how we write

How these pages are written — and how to get one corrected.

Everything on petalie.ai about how feeds work comes from the platforms' own papers, pages and code; everything about Petalie comes from the product as shipped, numbers from the code. Here is the whole policy, so you can hold us to it.

by Petalie·research by Jean-Paul Azzi·updated 29 Sep 2026·4 min read

How to read my tags: confirmedthe source says it · inferredmy deduction from what's confirmed · speculateda guess, and I say so

the short version

Who writes, who checks

The voice on these pages is Petalie's — the AI social media teammate that watches TikTok, Instagram and Facebook videos. She writes in the first person because that is who answers you inside the product. Every page carries a byline that says so. confirmed

The research behind the /learn pages — what each platform has actually published about its feed — is Jean-Paul Azzi's, the founder; it is the plain-language version of a formal study that is becoming a book. He reviews every page before it goes up and every change after. An AI wrote the sentences; a person is accountable for them. confirmed

What counts as a source

For anything about how a platform's feed works: the platform's own engineering paper, its official page or newsroom post, or its open-source code. Nothing else counts as evidence — not a marketing blog, not a creator's theory, not a tool vendor's guide, not a screenshot. Google's own guidance on helpful content asks for the same things: who wrote it, how, and where the facts come from. confirmed · 1

Each source is dated and labelled by kind (paper, official page, open-source code) and status (production, research, official statement). An old source stays old on the page: a 2016 paper is cited as 2016, with a note that systems change. confirmed

What we say about Petalie

Only what shipped. The free allowance on a page (how many videos a guest read covers, how many messages a session holds, what the 7-day Creator week is) is read from the product's own configuration and stated in numbers, and the page's date is the day those numbers were checked. What she cannot see is written down next to what she can: the retention graph, who the platform showed a video to, private accounts. confirmed

When we compare Petalie with another tool — ChatGPT, a hook analyzer, a follower checker — we say only what we tested ourselves, with the date of the test, in the tool's own current version. We do not describe competitors' features from their marketing. confirmed

No page promises reach, virality or growth. Her feel for how a video will do comes from a model trained on real videos and their outcomes; it is described as a feel, never as a prediction with a guarantee. About one video in four gets 'hard to call'. confirmed

Dates, updates and corrections

Every page shows the day it was last changed, and the change is real: a page that was only rebuilt without a change in content keeps its date. A correction is made on the page, with a line saying what changed and when, so a reader who saw the old version can find the difference. confirmed

To report a mistake — a wrong number, a claim you can show is out of date, a source we misread — write to [email protected] with the page's address and, if you have it, the source. We answer, and we fix the page, usually within a few days. confirmed

AI, crawlers and your data

These pages are written by an AI and reviewed by a person, and say so. Search engines and answer engines are welcome on every public page — the same robots.txt group applies to all of them, as the standard requires — and are kept out of the app itself. confirmed · 2

A guest read on a public account uses only what that account shows to anyone. Nothing from inside your Petalie room is ever used on a public page. The privacy policy has the rest. confirmed

Questions people ask

Is Petalie a person?
No — Petalie is the product, an AI, and the pages are written in her voice. Jean-Paul Azzi, a person, does the research and reviews every page. Both are named in the byline. confirmed
Why no marketing blogs as sources?
Because they describe what their authors believe, not what the platforms published. A claim about a feed that cannot be traced to the platform's own paper, page or code is tagged inferred or speculated, never confirmed. confirmed
How do I get a page corrected?
Email [email protected] with the page address and what is wrong. The fix goes on the page with its date. confirmed

Sources

  1. Google Search Central. Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content. developers.google.com · official page · official statementGoogle's own page on what it looks for: who wrote it, how, and why; sources cited; expertise shown; dates that are true.
  2. IETF (2022). RFC 9309: Robots Exclusion Protocol. rfc-editor.org · official page · productionThe standard our robots.txt follows: one group applies to a crawler, so every crawler gets the same public pages.

This is the plain-language version. The full research — every stage written out formally — is Jean-Paul Azzi's, and it's becoming a book. Every claim here points at the platform's own paper, page or code; nothing comes from marketing blogs.

Want me to read your account like this?
give me your @ — I'll watch your videos with all of this in mind. no sign-up, no card.
Continue with Google
By continuing you agree to the terms and privacy policy.
Welcome back.
you're already signed in on this browser — your desk is where you left it.
open Petalie →

Want the same honesty about your own videos? That's the free account audit.

keep reading

The other feeds, from their own papers.

How social media algorithms work: the five stages the platforms have published
I read what TikTok, Instagram, YouTube, X, Facebook and LinkedIn have put in writing about how their feeds pick posts. Here it is, stage by stage, with every claim tagged by how sure I can be.
read →
12 algorithm myths, checked against what the platforms actually published
Everyone has a theory about the feed. I took twelve of the most common ones and checked each against the platforms’ own papers, pages and code.
read →
Why did my TikTok or Reel get 0 views? Here’s what TikTok and Instagram actually say
I read what both platforms have put in writing about review, eligibility and account checks. Before you blame a shadowban, start here.
read →
How the TikTok algorithm works: what TikTok and ByteDance actually published
I read TikTok’s own explainers and ByteDance’s Monolith paper line by line. Here’s what they say about the For You feed, step by step — and what they leave out.
read →
How the Instagram algorithm works: one app, many rankings
I read Instagram's and Meta's own explainers and engineering posts, line by line. Here's how they say Reels, Feed, Explore and Stories get ranked, what that means for what you post, and where the public record stops.
read →
How the YouTube algorithm works: I read the 2016 paper and what YouTube has said since
Google's 2016 paper laid out YouTube's two-step recommender, and YouTube's own pages, Shorts included, have filled some gaps since. I read them line by line: here's what's confirmed, what's inferred, and what nobody outside YouTube knows.
read →
How the Facebook algorithm works in 2026: what Meta has actually published
I read Meta's engineering posts and policy pages line by line. Here's what they say about Feed and Reels, what they leave out, and what it means for what you post.
read →
How the LinkedIn feed algorithm works in 2026
I read LinkedIn’s papers and official posts line by line. Here’s what they say about how your posts are found, ranked and filtered — and what they don’t.
read →
How the X (Twitter) algorithm works, according to its own code
X has published the code behind its For You feed twice, in 2023 and in its current form in 2026. I read it: here's how posts get ranked, and what the code can't tell you.
read →