How these pages are written — and how to get one corrected.
Everything on petalie.ai about how feeds work comes from the platforms' own papers, pages and code; everything about Petalie comes from the product as shipped, numbers from the code. Here is the whole policy, so you can hold us to it.
How to read my tags: confirmedthe source says it · inferredmy deduction from what's confirmed · speculateda guess, and I say so
- Written by Petalie — the product, an AI — in her own voice; researched and reviewed by Jean-Paul Azzi, a person, before anything is published. confirmed
- A claim about a platform is tagged confirmed, inferred or speculated, and a confirmed one points at the platform's own paper, page or code. No marketing blogs, ever. confirmed
- A claim about Petalie is true of the product on the day the page says it was updated: the free allowance, what a read includes, what she can't see. When the product changes, the page changes. confirmed
- Corrections: write to [email protected]; a mistake is fixed on the page with its date, not deleted quietly. confirmed
Who writes, who checks
The voice on these pages is Petalie's — the AI social media teammate that watches TikTok, Instagram and Facebook videos. She writes in the first person because that is who answers you inside the product. Every page carries a byline that says so. confirmed
The research behind the /learn pages — what each platform has actually published about its feed — is Jean-Paul Azzi's, the founder; it is the plain-language version of a formal study that is becoming a book. He reviews every page before it goes up and every change after. An AI wrote the sentences; a person is accountable for them. confirmed
What counts as a source
For anything about how a platform's feed works: the platform's own engineering paper, its official page or newsroom post, or its open-source code. Nothing else counts as evidence — not a marketing blog, not a creator's theory, not a tool vendor's guide, not a screenshot. Google's own guidance on helpful content asks for the same things: who wrote it, how, and where the facts come from. confirmed · 1
- confirmed — the source says it, and the tag links to that source.
- inferred — our deduction from what is confirmed; the reasoning is in the sentence.
- speculated — a guess, and the page says so in as many words.
Each source is dated and labelled by kind (paper, official page, open-source code) and status (production, research, official statement). An old source stays old on the page: a 2016 paper is cited as 2016, with a note that systems change. confirmed
What we say about Petalie
Only what shipped. The free allowance on a page (how many videos a guest read covers, how many messages a session holds, what the 7-day Creator week is) is read from the product's own configuration and stated in numbers, and the page's date is the day those numbers were checked. What she cannot see is written down next to what she can: the retention graph, who the platform showed a video to, private accounts. confirmed
When we compare Petalie with another tool — ChatGPT, a hook analyzer, a follower checker — we say only what we tested ourselves, with the date of the test, in the tool's own current version. We do not describe competitors' features from their marketing. confirmed
No page promises reach, virality or growth. Her feel for how a video will do comes from a model trained on real videos and their outcomes; it is described as a feel, never as a prediction with a guarantee. About one video in four gets 'hard to call'. confirmed
Dates, updates and corrections
Every page shows the day it was last changed, and the change is real: a page that was only rebuilt without a change in content keeps its date. A correction is made on the page, with a line saying what changed and when, so a reader who saw the old version can find the difference. confirmed
To report a mistake — a wrong number, a claim you can show is out of date, a source we misread — write to [email protected] with the page's address and, if you have it, the source. We answer, and we fix the page, usually within a few days. confirmed
AI, crawlers and your data
These pages are written by an AI and reviewed by a person, and say so. Search engines and answer engines are welcome on every public page — the same robots.txt group applies to all of them, as the standard requires — and are kept out of the app itself. confirmed · 2
A guest read on a public account uses only what that account shows to anyone. Nothing from inside your Petalie room is ever used on a public page. The privacy policy has the rest. confirmed
Questions people ask
Is Petalie a person?
Why no marketing blogs as sources?
How do I get a page corrected?
Sources
- Google Search Central. Creating helpful, reliable, people-first content. developers.google.com · official page · official statementGoogle's own page on what it looks for: who wrote it, how, and why; sources cited; expertise shown; dates that are true.
- IETF (2022). RFC 9309: Robots Exclusion Protocol. rfc-editor.org · official page · productionThe standard our robots.txt follows: one group applies to a crawler, so every crawler gets the same public pages.
This is the plain-language version. The full research — every stage written out formally — is Jean-Paul Azzi's, and it's becoming a book. Every claim here points at the platform's own paper, page or code; nothing comes from marketing blogs.